COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RICE FARMER INCOME USING AND NOT USING COMBINE HARVESTER HARVESTER TOOLS IN PADANG VILLAGE, MANGGENG DISTRICT, ACEH BARAT DAYA DISTRICT
Main Article Content
Asmaul Husna
Devi Agustia
This research aims to analyze the comparison of the income of rice farmers who use combine harvesters and farmers who do not use combine harvesters in Padang Village, Manggeng District, Southwest Aceh Regency. The methods used are observation data collection techniques, direct interviews using questionnaires while data analysis uses quantitative descriptive methods. 95% test (0.05) comparative testing of the income of rice farmers who do not use combine machines and the income of rice farmers who use combine machines, shows a significant difference between the test values, where the t test shows that tcount = 5.70. Meanwhile ttable is 1.666. Because tcount > ttable, namely 5.70 > 1.666, it means that Ho is rejected and Hi is accepted, so it can be concluded that farmers' income with the use of combine machines will cause an increase in income. Thus, the difference between the income of rice farmers who do not use combine machines and the income of rice farmers who use combine machines at the 0.05 level, namely 0.000 < 0.05, is significantly different and causes an increase in income in Padang village, Manggeng District, Aceh Barat Daya Regency.
Al-Asri (2018) dengan judul Analisis Perbandingan Pendapatan Petani Padi Sawah Menggunakan Mesin Combine Hervester Dengan Cara Tradisional Di Gampong Blang Meurah Dua Pidie Jaya. Jurnal Agro Ristek. Vol 1, No 2 (2018) ISSN 2615-417X. Universitas Jabal Ghafur Indonesia
Aldillah R. 2016. Kinerja Pemanfaatan Mekanisasi Pertanian dan Implikasinya Dalam Upaya Percepatan Produksi Pangan di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. 34 (2): 163-177
Amare Dagninet, Endalew Wolelaw. 2016. Agricultural Mechanization: Assessment of Mechanization Impact Experiences on The Rural Population and The Implications for Ethiopian Smallholders. Engineering and Applied Sciences. 1(2): 39-48.
Amrullah, Eka Rastiyanto dan Ani Pullalla. 2019. Dampak Penggunaan Combine Harvester Terhadap Kehilangan Hasil Panen Padi di Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, Volume 37 No. 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jae.v37n2.2019.113-12
Ananto E. E., A. Setyono dan Sutrisno. 2013. Panduan Teknis Penanganan Panen dan Pascapanen Padi Dalam Sistem Usahatani Tanaman-Ternak. Puslitbangtan, Bogor.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Manajemen Penelitian. Penerbit Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. hal. 98 Hasibuan, F. 1999. Kajian Teknis dan Ekonomis Pemakaian Head Feed Combine harvester(CA 385 EG) di Daerah Sukamadi, Kabupaten Subang, Jawa Barat. Skripsi. Jurusan Mekanisasi Pertanian. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian. IPB. Bogor.
Budiman, A. 2016. Pembagian Kerja Secara Seksual, Sebuah Perusahaan Secara Sosiologis tentang Peran Perempuan di masyarakat. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kurnia (2022) dengan judul analisis perbandingan pendapatan usahatani padi antara petani yang menggunakan alat panen combine harvester dan petani yang tidak menggunakan alat panen combine harvester di kec. Ujungjaya, kab. Sumedang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Agribisnis VI Volume 6, Nomor 1, Tahun 2022 : 260-267. Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Jawa Barat.
Manyamsari I, Mujiburrahmad. 2014. Karakteristik Petani Dan Hubungannya Dengan Kompetensi Petani Lahan Sempit. Agrisep 15(2): 58-74
Nurhasikin. 2016. Penduduk Usia Produktif dan Ketenagakerjaan. http://kepri.bkkbn.go.id/Lists/Artikel/DispForm.aspx?I
Purwantini TB, Susilowati SH. 2018. Dampak Penggunaan Alat Mesin Panen Terhadap Kelembagaan Usaha Tani Padi. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 16(1): 73-88. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v16n1.2018.73-88
Sukirno MS. 2015. Mekanisasi Pertanian: Pokok Bahasan Alat Mesin Pertanian dan Pengelolaannya. Diktat Kuliah UGM. Yogyakarta (ID): Universitas Gadjah Mada
