ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP STYLE, WORK STRESS AND COMPENSATION ON EMPLOYEE WORK PERFORMANCE AT PT. MULTIMAS NABATI ASAHAN MEDAN
Main Article Content
Adrian Babtissay Simbolon
This study aims to describe the influence of leadership style, work stress, and compensation on employee work performance at PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan Medan which lasted for 2 (two) months starting from April 2024 until May 2024. This research was using descriptive and quantitative methods. The respondents of this research are all employees at PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan Medan which has a total of 88 (eighty eight) employees. The instrument of this research is questionnaires to collect data from variables of leadership variables, variables of work stress, variables of compensation and variables of employee work performance. The technique of data analysis was using validity test, reliability test, descriptive analysis, normality test, multicolinearity test, heterocedacity test, multiple linear regression analysis, multiple linear correlation coefficient test, partial hypothesis test or t test, simultaneous test or F test, and calculation of coefficient determination. The results of descriptive analysis for variables of leadership style, variables of compensation and variables of employee work performance are in good category, while variables of work stress are in very not good category at PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan Medan. Based on the results of hypothesis testing partially, the variables of leadership style and compensation have a positive and significant influence on employee work performance at PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan Medan. While the variable of work stress has a negative and significant influence on employee work performance at PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan Medan. Silmutaneously, variables of leadership style, work stress and compensation have a positive and significant influence on employee work performance at PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan Medan. The contribution of leadership style, work stress and compensation to improve employee work performance is 0.773 or 77.3%., while the rest of 0.227 or 22.7% is influenced by other variables not investigated on this research such as motivation, discipline, communication, training, etc.
Buku-buku
Afandi, Pandi. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Zanafa Publishing, Pekanbaru. Arikunto, S. 2016. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. Budiastuti, Dyah & Bandur, Agustinus. 2018. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian, Dilengkapi
Analisis dengan NVIVO, SPSS dan AMOS, Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta
Feriyanto, dkk. 2015. Pengantat Manajemen (3 in 1) untuk Mahasiswa dan Umum, Mediatera, Yogyakarta.
Fuad, A. 2014. Paduan Praktis Penelitian Kualitatif, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23, Edisi Kedelapan, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Hair, Joseph. F., dkk. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 7th ed.
Hasibuan, H. M. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi, PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta. Herlina, V. 2019. Paduan Praktis Mengolah Data Kuisioner Menggunakan SPSS, PT. Elex Media
Komputindo, Jakarta.
Kartono, K. 2016. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan : Apakah Kepemimpinan Abnormal Itu?, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Kasmadi, & Sunariah, N. S. 2014. Panduan Modern Penelitian Kuantitaif, Alfabeta, Bandung. Mangkunegara, A. P. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Remaja Rosdakarya,
Bandung.
Nawawi, H. 2014. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Sanusi, A. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Salemba Empat, Jakarta. Simamora, H. 2014. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, STIE YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sunyoto, D. 2013. Perilaku Organisasi, Penerbit CAPS, Yogyakarta.
Suwatno, & Priansa, D. J. 2011. Manajemen SDM dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Wiyono, G. 2011. Merancang Penelitian Bisnis dengan Alat Analisis SPSS 17.0 & SmartPLS 2.0, UUP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Jurnal
Asrani, R., Margono, A., & Resmawan, E. (2013). Pengaruh Stres Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Provinsi Kalimantan Timur di Samarinda. Jurnal Administrasi Reform, 1(2). (diakses 26 April 2024)
Fikri. (2008). Pengaruh Tipe Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Pegawai Kecamatan Lowokwaru Kota Malang. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 6(1), 98. (diakses 24 April 2024)
Kumala, H. R., & Agustina, T. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Arsip dan Perpustakaan Daerah Kabupaten Bogor. Widya Cipta, 26-
(diakses 24 April 2024)
Parashakti, R. D., & Setiawan, D. I. (2019). Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada Bank BJB Cabang Tangerang. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 69-
(diakses 24 April 2024)
Putra, G. T., & Bagia, I. W. (2020). Pengaruh Kompensasi terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan pada PT Garuda Agung Kencana. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 204-208. (diakses 29 April 2024)
Qalbi, M. A., Hakam, M. S., & Djudi, M. (2016). Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karwayan (Studik Pada Karyawan Supir Truk PT. Dwi Raksa Supplier and Transporter). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 156-157. (diakses 30 April 2024)
Saraswati, Y. D. (2014). Preferensi Faktor – Faktor Kinerja Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (Pdam) Kabupaten Demak. Skripsi : Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro, 20-25. (diakses 28 April 2024)
Sulistyowati, A. (2018). Pengaruh Stres Kerja dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan PT ACTS Surabaya. Journal of Management and Accounting , 18-20. (diakses 25 April 2024)
