ANALYSIS OF COMPLIANCE LEVEL TOWARDS SMK3 AMONG CONSTRUCTION PROJECT WORKERS
Main Article Content
Ratna Sopiyatul Imamah
Dimas Aji Purnomo
Sunarko
The construction industry is experiencing increasing complexity that has an impact on occupational safety risks. Dynamic work environments trigger workers' non-compliance with established safety procedures. Many construction projects experience work accidents due to weak SMK3 implementation systems in the field. Workers often ignore safety instructions due to lack of motivation, weak organizational culture, and low risk understanding. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence compliance with SMK3 among construction project workers. This study uses a qualitative approach based on literature review through a systematic analysis of academic sources published in 2023–2025. This study reveals that organizational culture, intrinsic motivation, risk understanding, and technology utilization have a major contribution to worker compliance. Systems that involve workers in formulating safety policies show higher levels of compliance. Application-based surveillance technology helps improve worker reporting and awareness in the field. Risk-based training that is developed in an applicative manner has proven to be more effective than formal training. This study concludes that compliance with SMK3 is formed through synergy between managerial systems and individual behavior. Companies need to build a safety culture that is applied consistently across all project lines. Project management needs to provide simulation-based training and real-time reporting systems to increase risk awareness. Researchers recommend an integrative strategy involving two-way communication, safety incentives, and the use of adaptive technology to establish sustainable compliance. A safety system that is adapted to field realities will increase the effectiveness of SMK3 implementation in the construction sector.
Arana-Landín, G., Laskurain-Iturbe, I., Iturrate, M., & Landeta-Manzano, B. (2023). Assessing the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on occupational health and safety. Heliyon, 9(3), e13720. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13720
Bautista-Bernal, I., Quintana-García, C., & Marchante-Lara, M. (2024). Safety culture, safety performance and financial performance. A longitudinal study. Safety Science, 172(106409), 106409. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106409
Bergman Bruhn, Å., Lindahl, C., Andersson, I.-M., & Rosén, G. (2023). Motivational factors for occupational safety and health improvements: A mixed-method study within the Swedish equine sector. Safety Science, 159(106035), 106035. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106035
Chern, W.-C., Hyeon, J., Nguyen, T. V., Asari, V. K., & Kim, H. (2023). Context-aware safety assessment system for far-field monitoring. Automation in Construction, 149(104779), 104779. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104779
Creswell, J.W. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2024). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Press.
Dewi, R.A. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 21(1), 55-62.
Flor-Unda, O., Fuentes, M., Dávila, D., Rivera, M., Llano, G., Izurieta, C., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2023). Innovative technologies for occupational health and safety: A scoping review. Safety (Basel, Switzerland), 9(2), 35. doi:10.3390/safety9020035
Fridan, A. A. A., & Maamari, B. E. (2024). Impact of organizational positive and negative culture on employee performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(9), 1850–1869. doi:10.1108/ijoa-05-2023-3778
Handoko, T.H. (2023). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE Yogyakarta.
Iman, N., Nitawati, E. Y., & Triandani, D. (2023). The implications of occupational safety and health, discipline, and motivation on employee performance and productivity at pt. Sarana Warna Megah Surabaya. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 41–53. doi:10.56943/joe.v2i1.234
Khan, N., Zaidi, S. F. A., Yang, J., Park, C., & Lee, D. (2023). Construction work-stage-based rule compliance monitoring framework using computer vision (CV) technology. Buildings, 13(8), 2093. doi:10.3390/buildings13082093
Kunodzia, R., Bikitsha, L. S., & Haldenwang, R. (2024). Perceived factors affecting the implementation of Occupational Health and Safety management systems in the south African construction industry. Safety (Basel, Switzerland), 10(1), 5. doi:10.3390/safety10010005
Liu, X., Liu, Y., Li, H., & Wen, D. (2023). Identification and analysis of barriers to the effectiveness of ISO 45001 certification in Chinese certified organisations: A DEMATEL-ISM approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 383(135447), 135447. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135447
Mittal, A. (2024). O-208 translational training in ohs. Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England), 74(Supplement_1), 0–0. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqae023.1001
Rahman, M. H., Ghasemi, A., Dai, F., & Ryu, J. (2023). Review of emerging technologies for reducing ergonomic hazards in construction workplaces. Buildings, 13(12), 2967. doi:10.3390/buildings13122967
Schein, E.H. (2023). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Sorlini, A., Maxia, L., Patrucco, M., & Pira, E. (2023). Occupational Safety and health improvements through innovative technologies in underground construction sites: Main trends and some case histories. Infrastructures, 8(6), 104. doi:10.3390/infrastructures8060104
Tampubolon, H. (2024). Optimizing competence and achievement motivation on job satisfaction and teacher organizational culture at SMK PENABUR, West Jakarta. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 536–549. doi:10.70082/esiculture.vi.709
Widyanty, W., Oktasari, D. P., Santoso, S., Sumaedi, S., Yarmen, M., Bakti, I. G. M. Y., … Saniuk, S. (2024). The model of worker’s quality of life during Covid-19 pandemic: The role of perceived organizational support (POS), digital literacy, Covid-19-related workplace policy, quality culture, and safety culture. SAGE Open, 14(2). doi:10.1177/21582440241247036
Yang, J., Ye, G., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., & Liu, Y. (2023). Linking construction noise to worker safety behavior: The role of negative emotion and regulatory focus. Safety Science, 162(106093), 106093. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106093
Zhao, X., & Yan, D. (2023). Incorporating technological acceptance model into safety compliance of construction workers in Australia. Safety Science, 163(106127), 106127. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106127
Zohar, D. (2023). Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations: Theoretical and Applied Implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(2), 123-135.