COMMUNITY COEXISTENCE AND ATTITUDES TOWARD SUMATRAN ELEPHANT CONFLICT IN ARAS NAPAL KIRI, BESITANG, LANGKAT: A REVIEW OF HUMAN-ELEPHANT INTERACTION IN THE CONTEXT OF CONSERVATION
Published:
2026-05-26Downloads
Abstract
The Sumatran elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus) is a critically endangered species whose survival is increasingly threatened by human-elephant conflict (HEC) resulting from habitat fragmentation and expanding agricultural activities. This study investigates community coexistence and attitudes toward HEC in Dusun Aras Napal Kiri, Besitang, Langkat—a buffer zone adjacent to Gunung Leuser National Park (TNGL). A mixed-method approach combining quantitative surveys (n=28 households) and qualitative interviews was employed, supported by stakeholder analysis using an interest-influence matrix. Results show that 85% of respondents reported frequent conflicts, with 86% experiencing crop damage and annual economic losses equivalent to 1–1.5 months of household income. Despite the high conflict intensity, respondents exhibited a positive perception score of 1,191 out of 1,680, indicating ambivalent yet conservation-supportive attitudes—a condition defined as fragile coexistence. Stakeholder analysis identified UPT TNGL and UPT BKSDA as key players, community leaders and NGOs as agents to keep satisfied, while plantation companies and the general community occupy a monitoring role. The study recommends an integrated socio-ecological strategy encompassing community-based mitigation, adaptive agriculture, economic risk redistribution, and collaborative governance to transition toward sustainable coexistence.
Keywords:
coexistence conservation human-elephant conflict stakeholder analysis Sumatran elephantReferences
Abdullah, A., Sayuti, A., Hasanuddin, H., Affan, M., & Wilson, G. (2019). People's perceptions of elephant conservation and the human-elephant conflict in Aceh Jaya, Sumatra, Indonesia. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 65(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-019-1307-1
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ardiantiono, Sugiyo, Johnson, P. J., Lubis, M. I., Amama, F., Sukatmoko, Marthy, W., & Zimmermann, A. (2021). Towards coexistence: Can people's attitudes explain their willingness to live with Sumatran elephants in Indonesia? Conservation Science and Practice, 3(9), e520. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.520
Berliani, K., Alikodra, H. S., Masy'Ud, B., & Kusrini, M. D. (2018). Evaluation of human elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus) conflict in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1116(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1116/5/052014
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Carter, N. H., & Linnell, J. D. C. (2016). Co-adaptation is key to coexisting with large carnivores. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(8), 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.006
Dickman, A. J., Marchini, S., & Manfredo, M. (2013). The human dimension in addressing conflict with large carnivores. Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2, 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118520178.ch7
Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
Gunaryadi, D., & Hedges, S. (2017). Community-based human–elephant conflict mitigation: The value of an evidence-based approach in promoting the uptake of effective methods. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0173742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173742
Kansky, R., Kidd, M., & Knight, A. T. (2016). A wildlife tolerance model and case study for understanding human wildlife conflicts. Biological Conservation, 201, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.002
Karanth, K. K., Gopalaswamy, A. M., Prasad, P. K., & Dasgupta, S. (2013). Patterns of human–wildlife conflicts and compensation: Insights from Western Ghats protected areas. Biological Conservation, 166, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.027
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
KSDAE, D. J. (2020). Rencana tindakan mendesak penyelamatan populasi gajah Sumatera (Elephas maximus sumatranus) 2020–2023. Direktorat KKH-KSDAE, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Kuswanda, W., Garsetiasih, R., Gunawan, H., Situmorang, R. O. P., Hutapea, F. J., Kwatrina, R. T., Karlina, E., Atmoko, T., Zahrah, M., Takandjandji, M., & Gunaryadi, D. (2022). Can humans and elephants coexist? A review of the conflict on Sumatra Island, Indonesia. Diversity, 14(6), 420. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060420
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966). On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist, 100(916), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1086/282454
Mossbrucker, A. M. (2021). Island elephants: The giants of Sumatra. International Elephant Project.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Qomariah, I. N., Rahmi, T., Said, Z., & Wijaya, A. (2019). Conflict between human and wild Sumatran elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus Temminck, 1847) in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 20(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d200110
Raum, S. (2018). A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK. Ecosystem Services, 29, 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.005
Reed, M. S. (2018). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26(S2), S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
Rianti, A., & Garsetiasih, R. (2018). Persepsi masyarakat terhadap gangguan gajah Sumatera (Elephas maximus sumatranus) di Kabupaten Ogan Komering Ilir. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 14(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2017.14.2.83-99
Salsabila, A., Gunardi, D. W., & Arief, D. (2017). Studi perilaku gajah Sumatera (Elephas maximus sumatranus) di Pusat Konservasi Gajah Taman Nasional Way Kambas. Scripta Biologica, 4(4), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.sb.2017.4.4.640
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alfi Syahrin Siregar, Ma'rifatin Zahra, Raden Garsetiasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
