Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): JUNE
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

THE IMPACT OF URBAN AGGLOMERATION ON FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN INDONESIA: EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL PRIORITY METROPOLITAN AREAS

Authors

Dian Kania Elizabeth Hasibuan , Andis Destrian Irianto , Mugia Tresna Feira , Elga Yulia Delvira

Published:

2026-07-25

Downloads

Abstract

Urban agglomeration is a spatial phenomenon that reflects the concentration of population, economic activity, and rapidly developing infrastructure in Indonesia’s metropolitan areas. The government has designated ten National Priority Metropolitan Areas (KMPN) in the National Spatial Plan and the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) for 2020-2024 and 2025-2029 as centers of national economic growth; however, this designation has not been accompanied by an empirical study on its impact on fiscal decentralization as mandated by Law No. 33 of 2004. This study aims to analyze the impact of urban agglomeration on the Degree of Fiscal Decentralization (DDF) in 514 regencies and cities across Indonesia in 2022, both directly and through interactions with metropolitan status. Using an explanatory quantitative approach and a census method, urban agglomeration was measured across four dimensions (social, economic, environmental, and infrastructure) and then analyzed using a t-test, simple linear regression, and interaction regression. The results show that the average DDF for metropolitan areas (27.54%) is significantly higher by 18.22 percentage points than that of non-metropolitan areas (9.31%). All four dimensions of agglomeration have a positive and significant effect on DDF, with the infrastructure dimension being the strongest factor (β = 0.163). The interaction model reveals that metropolitan status alone does not necessarily increase DDF; rather, it is highly dependent on the intensity and quality of agglomeration (interaction β = 0.1795; p < 0.001). These findings recommend intensifying infrastructure development, fostering agglomeration-based economic clusters, strengthening cross-regional metropolitan governance, and establishing a national agglomeration monitoring system to enhance local fiscal autonomy.

Keywords:

urban agglomeration fiscal decentralization metropolitan areas fiscal autonomy evidence-based policy

References

Adisasmita, R. (2011). Teori-teori pembangunan ekonomi. Graha Ilmu.

Bappenas. (2023). RPJMN 2020–2024. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. https://bappenas.go.id

Bappenas. (2024). Analisis usulan RO wilayah metropolitan periode RPJMN 2025–2045.

Bird, R. M., & Vaillancourt, F. (Eds.). (1998). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries. Cambridge University Press.

Cervero, R. (1998) The Transit Metropolis. A Global Inquiry. Island Press, Washington DC.

Davies, P. (2004). Is evidence-based government possible? In J. L. Donaldson, A. Gray, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Evidence-based policy: Reflecting on the debate (pp. 9–25). Wiley-Blackwell.

Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2063–2117). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1

Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press.

Glaeser, E. L., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 983–1028. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.4.983

Halim, A. (2007). Akuntansi keuangan daerah. Salemba Empat.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2023). Evaluasi RPJMN dan arah pengembangan 10 wilayah metropolitan nasional.

Litvack, J., Ahmad, J., & Bird, R. (1998). Rethinking decentralization in developing countries. World Bank.

Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31(9), 1597–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00109-8

Mori, Tomoya & Smith, Tony E., 2015. "On the spatial scale of industrial agglomerations," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-20.

OECD. (2015). The metropolitan century: Understanding urbanisation and its consequences. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264228733-en

Rosenthal, S.S. & Strange, W.C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: J.V. Henderson and J.F. Thisse (eds.) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4: Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2119–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3

Song, Y., Zenou, Y., & Ding, C. (2008). Let’s Not Throw the Baby Out with the Bath Water: The Role of Urban Villages in Housing Rural Migrants in China. Urban Studies, 45(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098007085965

Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839

Wu, A. M., Ye, L., & Li, H. (2018). The impact of fiscal decentralization on urban agglomeration: Evidence from China. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1484254

Author Biographies

Dian Kania Elizabeth Hasibuan, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Author Origin : Indonesia

Andis Destrian Irianto, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Author Origin : Indonesia

Mugia Tresna Feira, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Author Origin : Indonesia

Elga Yulia Delvira, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Author Origin : Indonesia

How to Cite

Dian Kania Elizabeth Hasibuan, Andis Destrian Irianto, Mugia Tresna Feira, & Elga Yulia Delvira. (2026). THE IMPACT OF URBAN AGGLOMERATION ON FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN INDONESIA: EVIDENCE FROM NATIONAL PRIORITY METROPOLITAN AREAS. International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET), 5(7), 4986–4993. Retrieved from https://ijset.org/index.php/ijset/article/view/2105

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.