DECISION-MAKING UNDER QUOTA CONSTRAINTS: DISCRETION AMONG STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS IN SUBSIDIZED HEALTH INSURANCE IMPLEMENTATION AT THE SERANG CITY SOCIAL SERVICE OFFICE
Published:
2026-05-30Downloads
Abstract
This study examines how street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) make decisions under quota constraints in implementing subsidized health insurance, particularly the Contribution Assistance Recipient (PBI) scheme under Indonesia’s national health insurance system (BPJS), at the Social Service Office of Serang City, Indonesia. It addresses the challenges of limited resources and increasing service demand that require SLBs to adapt policy practices in real-world conditions. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving key implementers. The findings reveal that discretion plays a central role, operating through practices such as restricting access and demand, administrative differentiation, regulation of client interactions and work situations, and influencing client behavior. Each decision made by SLBs determines access to health services for the poor and directly affects social welfare. These practices function as coping mechanisms that enable SLBs to manage workload pressures and allocate limited quota. However, discretion also has a dual nature: while it enhances flexibility and responsiveness, particularly in prioritizing vulnerable groups, it may also introduce risks to fairness and accountability. The study concludes that discretion operates within a complex interplay of institutional constraints and socio-political pressures, highlighting the need for balanced governance to ensure both adaptability and accountability in policy implementation.
Keywords:
Discretion Street-Level Bureaucracy Decision-Making Quota Constraints Subsidized Health InsuranceReferences
Alawode, G. O., & Adewole, D. A. (2021). Assessment of the design and implementation challenges of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Nigeria: a qualitative study among sub-national level actors, healthcare and insurance providers. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10133-5
Chang, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Street-Level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517
Edri-Peer, O., & Cohen, N. (2025). Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 35(4), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf022
Edri-Peer, O., & Cohen, N. (2026). Street-level bureaucrats’ cognitive coping during public service delivery: a systematic literature review. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2026.2620549
Ferreira, V. D. R. S., Medeiros, J. J., Bright, C. L., & Crumpton, C. D. (2021). Implementing social policy in Brazil: an inter-contextual exploration of the exercise of discretion by street-level bureaucrats. International Public Management Journal, 24(6), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1711474
Hassan, M. S., Al Halbusi, H., Ahmad, A. B., Abdelfattah, F., Thamir, Z., & Raja Ariffin, R. N. (2023). Discretion and its effects: analyzing the role of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement styles. International Review of Public Administration, 28(4), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2023.2286671
Hassan, M. S., Ariffin, R. N. R., Mansor, N., & Al Halbusi, H. (2021). An examination of street-level bureaucrats’ discretion and the moderating role of supervisory support: Evidence from the field. Administrative Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030065
Houeninvo, H. G., Bello, K., Hounkpatin, H., & Dossou, J. P. (2022). Developing and implementing National Health Insurance: learnings from the first try in Benin. BMJ Global Health, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009027
Iskandar, D. (2021). Bureaucratic Red Tape and Discretion of Street Level Bureaucracy: Implication of Food Diversification Policy in Indonesia.
Knox, S., & Arshed, N. (2024). Street-level discretion, personal motives, and social embeddedness within public service ecosystems. Public Administration Review, 84(5), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13761
Leonardi, D., Paraciani, R., & Raspanti, D. (2021). A strategy is necessary. The policy–client conflict within different relational asymmetries: a comparison at the street-level. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(13–14), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2021-0188
Lipsky, M. (2010). Streel-level democracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services (Updated). Russell Sage Foundation.
Montel, L., Ssenyonga, N., Coleman, M. P., & Allemani, C. (2022). How should implementation of the human right to health be assessed? A scoping review of the public health literature from 2000 to 2021. In International Journal for Equity in Health (Vol. 21, Number 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01742-0
Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2014). Social research methods : qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
Pedroza, L., & Arrighi, J. T. (2025). Perspectives on the implementation gap in citizenship policy. In Comparative Migration Studies (Vol. 13, Number 1). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00424-4
Tendengu, T. P. (2024). The efficacy of social welfare in social policy: Challenges, prospects and a way forward in Social Work Practise with young refugee women in Zimbabwe. In Refugees and Migrants - Current Conditions and Future Trends [Working Title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004334
Thomann, E., Van Engen, N., & Tummers, L. (2018). Public Management Research Association The Necessity of Discretion. Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 28(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.2307/48556477
van Berkel, R., Penning de Vries, J., & Knies, E. (2022). Managing Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Performance by Promoting Professional Behavior Through HRM. Public Personnel Management, 51(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260211046554
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Xiao, Y., & Liang, Z. (2026). Reduced perceived discretion, diminished felt accountability, and ineffective gender representation: The impact of AI on street-level bureaucracy. Government Information Quarterly, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2026.102140
WHO. (2025). Tracking universal health coverage: 2025 global monitoring report.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novita Sari, Bambang Shergi Laksmono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
