INTERNAL AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE UNDER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND RELATIONAL PRESSURE: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY
Published:
2026-05-24Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to understand the experiences of internal auditors in maintaining independence in audit conflict of interest situations. The study uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological method to explore the experiences of internal auditors when facing independence threats in the audit process. The research informants consisted of two internal auditors: an auditor who audited a colleague suspected of fraud and an auditor who faced audit pressure due to power relations within the organization. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using Moustakas' phenomenological approach. The results show that auditor independence is not only interpreted as compliance with professional standards, but also as a moral responsibility and professional identity of the auditor. Threats to independence arise through relational closeness, social pressure, and power relations that give rise to internal conflicts in the audit process. Auditors strive to maintain objectivity through self-control, limiting personal interactions, and a commitment to professionalism and integrity. This study shows that auditor independence is a complex experience that simultaneously involves professional, emotional, social, and moral dimensions.
Keywords:
auditor independence internal auditor conflict of interest phenomenology.References
Ahmad, Z., & Taylor, D. (2009). Commitment to independence by internal auditors: The effects of role ambiguity and role conflict. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(9), 899–925.
Alleyne, P., & Howard, M. (2005). An exploratory study of auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection in Barbados. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(3), 284–303.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Church, B. K., Jenkins, G. J., McCracken, S. A., & Stanley, J. D. (2015). Auditor independence in fact: Research, regulatory, and practice implications drawn from experimental and archival research. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 217–238.
Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171.
Kadous, K., Kennedy, S. J., & Peecher, M. E. (2003). The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors’ judgments. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 671–695.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.
Stewart, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2010). Internal audit independence and objectivity: Emerging research opportunities. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(4), 328–360.
Tepalagul, N., & Lin, L. (2015). Auditor independence and audit quality: A literature review. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(1), 101–121
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arianti, Nur Khaerunnisa Zakir, Syarifah Fatimiyah, Alimuddin, Darwis Said
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
