AI-GENERATED AND USER-GENERATED CONTENT AND PURCHASE INTENTION THROUGH PERCEIVED AUTHENTICITY ON TIKTOK
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.23933133Published:
2026-11-03Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the relationships of AI-generated content (AIGC) and user-generated content (UGC) with purchase intention and the mediating role of perceived authenticity among TikTok users in Lhokseumawe, Indonesia. A quantitative survey employed purposive sampling and an online questionnaire. Of 133 responses received, 126 met the eligibility criteria. Data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling with SmartPLS 4. AIGC was positively associated with perceived authenticity (β = 0.270, p = .001), but its direct relationship with purchase intention was not significant (β = −0.075, p = .545). UGC was positively associated with perceived authenticity (β = 0.486, p < .001) and purchase intention (β = 0.302, p = .023). Perceived authenticity was also positively associated with purchase intention (β = 0.397, p < .001). Significant indirect relationships were identified for AIGC (β = 0.107, p = .009) and UGC (β = 0.193, p = .002). The model explained 47.1% of the variance in perceived authenticity and 34.9% in purchase intention. These findings support attention to authenticity in digital content strategies, while the local, observational survey limits causal interpretation and generalization.
Keywords:
AI-generated content perceived authenticity purchase intention TikTok user-generated contentReferences
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2022). Why's everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media. Social Media + Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241
Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of AI-generated content (AIGC): A history of generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.04226
Dewa, C. B., & Safitri, L. A. (2021). Pemanfaatan media sosial Tiktok sebagai media promosi industri kuliner di Yogyakarta pada masa pandemi Covid-19 (Studi kasus akun TikTok Javafoodie). Khasanah Ilmu: Jurnal Pariwisata dan Budaya, 12(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.31294/khi.v12i1.10132
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, Article 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
Graesch, J. P., Hensel-Börner, S., & Henseler, J. (2021). Information technology and marketing: An important partnership for decades. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(1), 123-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0510
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), Article 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Loebnitz, N., & Grunert, K. G. (2022). Let us be realistic: The impact of perceived brand authenticity and advertising image on consumers' purchase intentions of food brands. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12679
Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090-1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.001
Paris, B., & Donovan, J. (2019). Deepfakes and cheap fakes: The manipulation of audio and visual evidence. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DS_Deepfakes_Cheap_FakesFinal.pdf
Ren, L., Lee, S. K., & Chun, S. (2023). The effects of influencer type, regulatory focus, and perceived authenticity on consumers' purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1241-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12898
Schiffman, L. G., & Wisenblit, J. (2019). Consumer behavior (12th ed.). Pearson.
Yang, C. (2025). The impact of AIGC-generated advertising on consumers' purchase intentions: The moderating effects of algorithmic transparency and brand reputation. International Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 2(5), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.70267/ijassr.250205.1522
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adrikul Muna, Hamdiah, Rusydi Abubakar, Rahmaniar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










