Public Perceptions And Acceptance Of Ecoenzyme-Based Environmentally Friendly Soap In Lhokseumawe City
Published:
2026-08-10Downloads
Abstract
Ecoenzyme-based soap, formulated using fermented organic waste, may support household-level waste management and greener cleaning practices. This study examined public perceptions, acceptance, and perceived social and environmental implications of ecoenzyme-based environmentally friendly soap in Lhokseumawe City. A convergent mixed-methods design based on the Theory of Planned Behavior was used. Quantitative data were obtained from 54 questionnaire respondents and analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with 10 key informants and analyzed thematically using NVivo 12. Community perception was positive (mean = 4.29), with environmental friendliness receiving the highest rating (mean = 4.72). Acceptance was strong (mean = 4.50), led by interest in using ecoenzyme soap as an alternative to conventional soap (mean = 5.00). Family support, perceived ease of use, environmental benefits, and perceived safety were important enabling factors. However, limited technical knowledge, product availability, and affordability may constrain sustained use. The findings indicate that high stated acceptance reflects behavioral intention rather than verified routine adoption. Education on production and use, quality standardization, and improved access are needed to translate favorable perceptions into sustained household practice
Keywords:
community acceptance eco-friendly soap ecoenzyme sustainable waste managementReferences
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Barman, I., Hazarika, S., Gogoi, J., & Talukdar, N. (2022). A systematic review on enzyme extraction from organic wastes and its application. Journal of Biochemical Technology, 13(3), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.51847/jvfupnki16
Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1–2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Vidalia, C., Angelina, E., Hans, J., Field, L. H., Santo, N. C., & Rukmini, E. (2023). Eco-enzyme as disinfectant: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Public Health Science, 12(3), 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v12i3.22131
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jannatul Liani, Abdul Malik, Syifa Saputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
